1 Reproducing kernel Hilbert space

1 Reproducing kernel Hilbert space

Let X⊂ℝd𝑋superscriptℝ𝑑 be a non-empty set. A function K:X×X→ℝ:𝐾→𝑋𝑋ℝ is called a symmetric positive definite (SPD) kernel if

K⁢(x,y)=K⁢(y,x)and∑i,j=1nci⁢cj⁢K⁢(xi,xj)≥0formulae-sequence𝐾𝑥𝑦𝐾𝑦𝑥andsuperscriptsubscript𝑖𝑗1𝑛subscript𝑐𝑖subscript𝑐𝑗𝐾subscript𝑥𝑖subscript𝑥𝑗0 (1)

for every finite set of points {x1,…,xn}⊂Xsubscript𝑥1…subscript𝑥𝑛𝑋 and every choice of real coefficients {c1,…,cn}⊂ℝsubscript𝑐1…subscript𝑐𝑛ℝ.

The classical Moore-Aronszajn theorem asserts that for every such kernel K𝐾 there exists a unique Hilbert space (ℋ,⟨⋅,⋅⟩ℋ)ℋsubscript⋅⋅ℋ of real-valued functions on X𝑋 with the following properties:

  1. (i)

    For each x∈X𝑥𝑋 the function K⁢(⋅,x)𝐾⋅𝑥 belongs to ℋℋ;

  2. (ii)

    For every f∈ℋ𝑓ℋ and every x∈X𝑥𝑋,

    f⁢(x)=⟨f,K⁢(⋅,x)⟩ℋ.𝑓𝑥subscript𝑓𝐾⋅𝑥ℋ (2)

The Hilbert space ℋℋ is called the reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) associated with the kernel K𝐾. The function K𝐾 itself is the reproducing kernel of ℋℋ. Property (2) characterizes the evaluation functional as a continuous linear functional on ℋℋ, which is usually called the reproducing property.

2 RKHS with Matérn kernel and Sobolev space

A particularly important class of RKHSs arises from shift-invariant kernels of the form

K⁢(x,y)=Φ⁢(x−y),Φ:ℝd→ℝ,:𝐾𝑥𝑦Φ𝑥𝑦Φ→superscriptℝ𝑑ℝ

where ΦΦ is an SPD kernel function. The next result describes the structure of the RKHS associated with such a kernel; see [4, Theorem 10.12].

Theorem 1 (RKHS of a shift-invariant kernel)

Let K⁢(x,y)=Φ⁢(x−y)𝐾𝑥𝑦Φ𝑥𝑦 be a shift-invariant kernel on ℝdsuperscriptℝ𝑑 with Φ∈C⁢(ℝd)∩L1⁢(ℝd)Φ𝐶superscriptℝ𝑑superscript𝐿1superscriptℝ𝑑. Then the associated RKHS is

ℋ={f∈L2⁢(ℝd)∩C⁢(ℝd):ℱ⁢[Φ]−12⁢ℱ⁢[f]∈L2⁢(ℝd)},ℋconditional-set𝑓superscript𝐿2superscriptℝ𝑑𝐶superscriptℝ𝑑ℱsuperscriptdelimited-[]Φ12ℱdelimited-[]𝑓superscript𝐿2superscriptℝ𝑑 (3)

where ℱ⁢[Φ]ℱdelimited-[]Φ is the Fourier transform of ΦΦ. The inner product on ℋℋ is

⟨f,g⟩ℋ=1(2⁢π)d/2⁢∫ℝdℱ⁢[f]⁢(ω)⁢ℱ⁢[g]⁢(ω)¯ℱ⁢[Φ]⁢(ω)⁢dω.subscript𝑓𝑔ℋ1superscript2𝜋𝑑2subscriptsuperscriptℝ𝑑ℱdelimited-[]𝑓𝜔¯ℱdelimited-[]𝑔𝜔ℱdelimited-[]Φ𝜔differential-d𝜔

Consider the Matérn kernel

Kν,l⁢(x,y)=Φν,l⁢(x−y),Φν,l⁢(x)=21−νΓ⁢(ν)⁢(2⁢ν⁢‖x‖l)ν⁢Bν⁢(2⁢ν⁢‖x‖l),formulae-sequencesubscript𝐾𝜈𝑙𝑥𝑦subscriptΦ𝜈𝑙𝑥𝑦subscriptΦ𝜈𝑙𝑥superscript21𝜈Γ𝜈superscript2𝜈norm𝑥𝑙𝜈subscript𝐵𝜈2𝜈norm𝑥𝑙 (4)

where ν,l>0𝜈𝑙0, and Bνsubscript𝐵𝜈 is the modified Bessel function of the second kind. The Fourier transform of Φν,lsubscriptΦ𝜈𝑙 is

ℱ⁢[Φν,l]⁢(ω)=Cν,l,d⁢(2⁢νl2+4⁢π2⁢‖ω‖2)−(ν+d2),ℱdelimited-[]subscriptΦ𝜈𝑙𝜔subscript𝐶𝜈𝑙𝑑superscript2𝜈superscript𝑙24superscript𝜋2superscriptnorm𝜔2𝜈𝑑2 (5)

where Cν,l,dsubscript𝐶𝜈𝑙𝑑 is a constant only depending on (ν,l,d)𝜈𝑙𝑑; see [5, §4.2]. Thus, the condition in (3) becomes (2⁢νl2+4⁢π2⁢‖ω‖2)(ν+d2)/2⁢f^⁢(ω)∈L2⁢(ℝd)superscript2𝜈superscript𝑙24superscript𝜋2superscriptnorm𝜔2𝜈𝑑22^𝑓𝜔superscript𝐿2superscriptℝ𝑑. Recall that for any s∈ℝ𝑠ℝ, the fractional Sobolev space on ℝdsuperscriptℝ𝑑 is

Hs⁢(ℝd)={f∈L2⁢(ℝd):(1+‖ω‖2)s2⁢f^⁢(ω)∈L2⁢(ℝd)},superscript𝐻𝑠superscriptℝ𝑑conditional-set𝑓superscript𝐿2superscriptℝ𝑑superscript1superscriptnorm𝜔2𝑠2^𝑓𝜔superscript𝐿2superscriptℝ𝑑 (6)

where f^⁢(ω)=(2⁢π)−d/2⁢∫ℝdf⁢(x)⁢e−i⁢⟨ω,x⟩⁢dx^𝑓𝜔superscript2𝜋𝑑2subscriptsuperscriptℝ𝑑𝑓𝑥superscript𝑒𝑖𝜔𝑥differential-d𝑥 is the Fourier transform of f𝑓. The Sobolev embedding theorem states that Hs⁢(ℝd)⊂C⁢(ℝd)superscript𝐻𝑠superscriptℝ𝑑𝐶superscriptℝ𝑑 if s>d2𝑠𝑑2. Note that c1⁢(1+‖ω‖2)≤(2⁢νl2+4⁢π2⁢‖ω‖2)≤c2⁢(1+‖ω‖2)subscript𝑐11superscriptnorm𝜔22𝜈superscript𝑙24superscript𝜋2superscriptnorm𝜔2subscript𝑐21superscriptnorm𝜔2 with some c1,c2>0subscript𝑐1subscript𝑐20. Therefore, combining (3), (5) and (6), we conclude that: the RKHS with Matérn kernel K⁢(x,y)=Φν,l⁢(x−y)𝐾𝑥𝑦subscriptΦ𝜈𝑙𝑥𝑦 is norm-equivalent to the Sobolev space Hν+d2⁢(ℝd)superscript𝐻𝜈𝑑2superscriptℝ𝑑.

For a domain Ω∈ℝdΩsuperscriptℝ𝑑 and s≥0𝑠0, the Sobolev space Hs⁢(Ω)superscript𝐻𝑠Ω is the set of restrictions of functions from Hs⁢(ℝd)superscript𝐻𝑠superscriptℝ𝑑 to ΩΩ equipped with the norm

∥f∥Hs⁢(Ω):=inf{∥g∥Hs⁢(ℝd):g∈Hs(ℝd),g|Ω=f}.

The RKHS with kernel Kν,lsubscript𝐾𝜈𝑙 can also be defined on ΩΩ. If ΩΩ is a Lipschitz domain, then ℋℋ with Matérn kernel is norm-equivalent to the Sobolev space Hν+d2⁢(Ω)superscript𝐻𝜈𝑑2Ω; see [4, §10.7].

3 Gaussian random field and covariance operator

The following result states that a Gaussian random field (GRF) with Matérn kernel can be given as the solution of a stochastic partial differential equation (SPDE); see [2].

Theorem 2

Let G⁢P⁢(0,Kν,l)𝐺𝑃0subscript𝐾𝜈𝑙 be a centered GRF on a Lipschitz domain Ω⊂ℝdΩsuperscriptℝ𝑑 such that the covariance function is the Matérn kernel Kν,lsubscript𝐾𝜈𝑙, and ΔΔ be the Laplacian with Dirichlet boundary condition. Then u∼G⁢P⁢(0,Kν,l)similar-to𝑢𝐺𝑃0subscript𝐾𝜈𝑙 is the unique solution of the fractional elliptic SPDE

(2⁢νl2−Δ)γ2⁢u=W,γ=ν+d2,formulae-sequencesuperscript2𝜈superscript𝑙2Δ𝛾2𝑢𝑊𝛾𝜈𝑑2 (7)

where W𝑊 is a spatial Gaussian white noise on L2⁢(Ω)superscript𝐿2Ω.

The above SPDE is defined in the distributional sense. Note that W𝑊 is an isometry from L2⁢(Ω)superscript𝐿2Ω to a centered Gaussian space and write ⟨W,ϕ⟩:=W⁢(ϕ)assign𝑊italic-ϕ𝑊italic-ϕ. Since (2⁢ν/l2−Δ)−γ2superscript2𝜈superscript𝑙2Δ𝛾2 is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator with γ>d2𝛾𝑑2, this implies that the random element u𝑢 lies in L2⁢(Ω)superscript𝐿2Ω almost surely, and the GRF G⁢P⁢(0,Kν,l)𝐺𝑃0subscript𝐾𝜈𝑙 induces a Gaussian measure on L2⁢(Ω)superscript𝐿2Ω. The Cameron-Martin space of the induced Gaussian measure is the RKHS ℋKν,lsubscriptℋsubscript𝐾𝜈𝑙, which is norm-equivalent to Hν+d2⁢(Ω)superscript𝐻𝜈𝑑2Ω and continuously embedded into L2⁢(Ω)superscript𝐿2Ω. For any ϕ∈L2⁢(Ω)italic-ϕsuperscript𝐿2Ω, the SPDE implies that

⟨W,ϕ⟩=⟨(2⁢ν/l2−Δ)γ2⁢u,ϕ⟩L2⁢(Ω)=⟨u,(2⁢ν/l2−Δ)γ2⁢ϕ⟩L2⁢(Ω),𝑊italic-ϕsubscriptsuperscript2𝜈superscript𝑙2Δ𝛾2𝑢italic-ϕsuperscript𝐿2Ωsubscript𝑢superscript2𝜈superscript𝑙2Δ𝛾2italic-ϕsuperscript𝐿2Ω

hence ⟨W,(2⁢ν/l2−Δ)−γ2⁢ψ⟩=⟨u,ψ⟩L2⁢(Ω)𝑊superscript2𝜈superscript𝑙2Δ𝛾2𝜓subscript𝑢𝜓superscript𝐿2Ω for any ψ∈L2⁢(Ω)𝜓superscript𝐿2Ω since (2⁢ν/l2−Δ)2𝜈superscript𝑙2Δ is invertible on L2⁢(Ω)superscript𝐿2Ω. For any ϕ,ψ∈L2⁢(Ω)italic-ϕ𝜓superscript𝐿2Ω, it follows that

𝔼⁢[⟨u,ϕ⟩L2⁢(Ω)⁢⟨u,ψ⟩L2⁢(Ω)]𝔼delimited-[]subscript𝑢italic-ϕsuperscript𝐿2Ωsubscript𝑢𝜓superscript𝐿2Ω =𝔼⁢[⟨W,(2⁢ν/l2−Δ)−γ2⁢ϕ⟩⁢⟨W,(2⁢ν/l2−Δ)−γ2⁢ψ⟩]absent𝔼delimited-[]𝑊superscript2𝜈superscript𝑙2Δ𝛾2italic-ϕ𝑊superscript2𝜈superscript𝑙2Δ𝛾2𝜓
=⟨(2⁢ν/l2−Δ)−γ2⁢ϕ,(2⁢ν/l2−Δ)−γ2⁢ψ⟩L2⁢(Ω)absentsubscriptsuperscript2𝜈superscript𝑙2Δ𝛾2italic-ϕsuperscript2𝜈superscript𝑙2Δ𝛾2𝜓superscript𝐿2Ω
=⟨(2⁢ν/l2−Δ)−γ⁢ϕ,ψ⟩L2⁢(Ω).absentsubscriptsuperscript2𝜈superscript𝑙2Δ𝛾italic-ϕ𝜓superscript𝐿2Ω

Note that 𝔼⁢[‖u‖L2⁢(Ω)2]<∞𝔼delimited-[]superscriptsubscriptnorm𝑢superscript𝐿2Ω2 by the Fernique’s theorem. This implies that Busubscript𝐵𝑢 define by Bu⁢(ϕ)=⟨u,ϕ⟩L2⁢(Ω)subscript𝐵𝑢italic-ϕsubscript𝑢italic-ϕsuperscript𝐿2Ω is a regular zero-mean generalized Gaussian field on L2⁢(Ω)superscript𝐿2Ω, and its covariance operator is (2⁢ν/l2−Δ)−γsuperscript2𝜈superscript𝑙2Δ𝛾. Therefore, the covariance operator can be written as the kernel integral operator

(TK⁢f)⁢(x)=∫ΩKν,l⁢(x,y)⁢f⁢(y)⁢dysubscript𝑇𝐾𝑓𝑥subscriptΩsubscript𝐾𝜈𝑙𝑥𝑦𝑓𝑦differential-d𝑦 (8)

defined on L2⁢(Ω)superscript𝐿2Ω; see [3, Exercise 3.2.14]. That is, it holds TK=(2⁢ν/l2−Δ)−γsubscript𝑇𝐾superscript2𝜈superscript𝑙2Δ𝛾.

A byproduct of the above result is that we can get the decay rate of the eigenvalues of the trace-class operator TKsubscript𝑇𝐾 on L2⁢(Ω)superscript𝐿2Ω or Hν+d2⁢(Ω)superscript𝐻𝜈𝑑2Ω (the eigenvalues are the same on these two spaces). For a bounded domain Ω⊂ℝdΩsuperscriptℝ𝑑, recall that the Laplacian −ΔΔ with Dirichlet boundary condition has eigenvalues {λj}jsubscriptsubscript𝜆𝑗𝑗 (arranged in ascending order) that increase obeying the Weyl’s law λj≍j2/dasymptotically-equalssubscript𝜆𝑗superscript𝑗2𝑑; see [1, §6.4]. Therefore, the eigenvalues of TKsubscript𝑇𝐾 are the eigenvalues of (2⁢ν/l2−Δ)−γsuperscript2𝜈superscript𝑙2Δ𝛾, which decays with the rate

μj=(2⁢ν/l+λj)−γ≍j−2⁢γ/d=j−(1+2⁢νd),j→∞.formulae-sequencesubscript𝜇𝑗superscript2𝜈𝑙subscript𝜆𝑗𝛾asymptotically-equalssuperscript𝑗2𝛾𝑑superscript𝑗12𝜈𝑑→𝑗 (9)

Therefore, the eigenvalues of TKsubscript𝑇𝐾 with Matérn kernel has a polynomial decay rate.

References

  • [1] D. Borthwick (2020) Spectral theory: basic concepts and applications. Springer. External Links: Link Cited by: §3.
  • [2] F. Lindgren, H. Rue, and J. Lindström (2011) An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 73 (4), pp. 423–498. External Links: Link Cited by: §3.
  • [3] S. V. Lototsky, B. L. Rozovsky, et al. (2017) Stochastic partial differential equations. Vol. 11, Springer. External Links: Link Cited by: §3.
  • [4] H. Wendland (2004) Scattered data approximation. Vol. 17, Cambridge university press. External Links: Link Cited by: §2, §2.
  • [5] C. K. Williams and C. E. Rasmussen (2006) Gaussian processes for machine learning. Vol. 2, MIT press Cambridge, MA. External Links: Link Cited by: §2.